∑ = ∞ ÷ Ω{(0∫2)÷1} where ∫=Ω as the element "time".
Or, Ω being the final notation of nonexistance.
[[Henceforward, this shall be known as The Joyous Equation. And, is copyrighted © 2014 by Dale Clarence Peterson}}
A day according to the calendar in use today is 23 hours and 57 minutes long. This is all based on the orbit of the earth around the sun and from that figure divisions being made down to this calculation for a day. From this we get down to hours and seconds and nanoseconds. Then we have to throw in an extra day every four years to make up for this three minute piece of time coinage.
Melt it down. The facts on which science bases all its fundamentals are flawed right at the core because of this sloppy system, or assumption. A side note: what supreme power would come up with that? Talk about horseshit. I’m not even going to try to get it all accurate, because it’s stupid right from the start.
Nanoseconds? Ha! A nearly inconceivably tiny fraction of a second? This is where, and why, I introduce the character ∫. If the numeral 0=off and 1=on, what represents the distance between 0 and 1. The speed of light, or C (a character chosen by Einstein for no other reason than he thought it was a good one in his equation E=M(C squared)) is used to calculate the vast distances that exist between all the innumerable celestial bodies in this thing we call the universe. Take a bunch of time calculated from this system and glop it together you get a light year.
Or, the distance light can travel in a year – which is pretty far we are also led to accept. On faith. Really despite all the facts we still have to accept this little piece of math on faith. Why? Time, as we know it – as I have just said – is just so damn vague.
The assumption that computations as carried out in binary code are infallible is shown to be impossible according to the above equation. According to binary math the existence of god (GOD) would be impossible. How could there be nothing between off and on? This is just not possible, but what is this factor, element, (thing)?
A computer works according to the clocking of "on v. off (0,1)". The number of computations per second in Mgb (MegaBytes - 1000 KiloBytes (another misnomer)) is what is referred to as this clocking. When a computer works at a rate that exceeds its actual real speed, or the speed at which the silicone chip (or chips as processors improve) within the processor actually does process, it is known as over-clocking. And, it is possible to trick a processor to do this.
I am not an engineer (that’s probably obvious), but I do consider myself somewhat of a logician. If you determine a pattern of mathematical conclusions, it is possible to skip actual steps, or sums. Let’s say you determine a dozen eggs equals twelve eggs and a dozen dozen equals a gross. When you load the egg truck, all you have to count are the boxes that contain a gross. You have just over-clocked your capacity to inventory what each egg truck is carrying.
Okay, so how does this work with binary code. Processed through several steps of coding, not necessary to explain, you wind up with glops (again with the glops?) of code called objects. All the processor has to do is pass off these objects to a second set of processor chips. The sum of objects comes back and the first set accepts these, passes those back – this continues until the object called end of line comes down to the processor through that line of code.
Put exactly the right objects together and you get a function. Put enough of the right functions together and you get a process. Processes result in data. And so on. La-di-da. All of this is based on a system that begins with eight bits to a byte, which comes out to 1024 bytes (not an even 1000) bytes to a kilobyte (bit of a misnomer there) and so on. Sloppy, once again. I see a lot of rounding out in this stuff.
However, if you use a tertiary system (Base 3) or 0,1,2, where 1= Ω as an element and ∫ as a function of 1 to determine the value of time between off and on, or in another sense distance, all of this sloppiness disappears. ∑ being the sum of all parts, ∑ must balance (equate) the infinite divided by not 0, or off, but 0 as and integral of on as 2 as factored by 1 .
So … not being a sectarian religious person, I find the only possible conclusion is that there has to be something we might call the sum of all parts (∑) that provides a place for the existence of the infinite, or ∞, and this can only be measured by Ω . And Ω cannot be expressed in the sloppy system we call the solar calendar or determination of time. It has to be expressed by an integral function , or ∫ of another value, in my formula being {(0∫2)÷1} .
In short there must be something between the place of no beginning and the place of no end we call infinity. And, this something cannot be distance as measured by time (as we calculate it), it must be an integral function of what exists between nonexistence and existence. And this eliminates the possibility of binary math as an accurate mathematical function.
Now all I have written here in this blog, might seem silly and, to some, a stupid parody of religion and even mathematics. In one sense it is, because as I have said I am, and cannot seem to help being, a religious skeptic and a true mathematical sophomore. However, if my dear readers can pull their minds out of the iron bucket that has been jammed down over all of our heads … well, think about it. Just consider my theory.
Author’s Note: None of the information in this blog has been researched or validated. So, don’t try it at home. I take no responsibility if you disappear or if hair begins to grow somewhere it shouldn’t. I don’t really believe in research only logic, which will be the subject of my next blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment