The First
Pentecostal Church of Heathens
Accepting that
Wikipedia is correct with its definition of what is Pentecostal, I think this is possible. It seems to just depend on whether or not you
accept the full acceptance of some kind of inerrancy
of some kind of document. Really, since this all predates Christianity
and Mohammed, etc. and that it was the ancient Greeks who mostly invented the word and concept – it could be just
about any book (as it were).
So let’s say I write a book laying down a sort of
set of rules and stuff for my Church
of Heathens to follow, and they pledge that they believe that this book has
no errors in it, then “Bob’s yer Uncle … we’re off to the races”. We have the First Pentecostal Church of Heathens. The question then is, “what is a heathen?”
Now here is
where, I believe, Wikipedia gets all muddled.
Mostly by confusing, or lumping, heathenism
with paganism and determining it
began in Germany and/or the Nordic regions.
Which is stupid. The Oxford
Dictionary of English says; “...Of an
individual or people: holding religious beliefs of a sort that are considered
unenlightened … (sic)” This makes sense
to me. Since I would definitely say that
when it comes to religion, I am assuredly
unenlightened.
And
I see no reason why I should not be able to get together with other persons who
also feel unenlightened – religiously. We
live in a time when the religiously
enlightened are all running around killing each other because some believe they are more enlightened than some other people. All of ‘em having jihads and standin’ their
ground and poking under rocks for WOMD.
Taking out hundreds of thousands of to-o-tally
innocent and uninvolved persons as collateral
damage!
Over
what? What the fuck do they want? What are they so pissed about? !!! They are just pissed as hell that there are
other people who are not enlightened in the enlightened way that they believe
they are enlightened. And that makes
them feel … maybe, insecure … or a little bit stupid. So if they simply just like kill everybody else who is not in the
same game as them, then that means they must be right – correct?
The
image I get is this; they are all just dung beetles rolling up their globs of
treasure. Guarding them against any and
all threats. Willing to fight and die
for their treasured glob and forgetting that it’s really just a big ball of
shit. You can call it God or Jehovah or Allah or Marvin.
IT’S STILL JUST A BIG BALL OF SHIT.
And how is any one ball of shit any different than any other? This is where my mind refuses to find enlightenment.
Another
question is, “Can you convert a dead
person to your personal brand of enlightenment?” A dead person can’t be said to believe in anything. Really.
Is there any difference between a dead Christian and a dead Muslim? Or dead
anything? Think about it. How do you verify anything, one way or
another? Let me ask this, “Is there any
way to be more unenlightened than
being dead?” Do the math.
This means, to me, that all dead
persons must be, according to the Oxford Dictionary of English, heathens.
What
is the difference between us Heathens
and Atheists and/or Agnostics?
Well, Agnostics says they
don’t know. “Is there a God? Is there no God? We don’t know and we don’t wanna say one way
or the other.” Atheists say, “Ain’t no
God!” or more politically correct according to Atheists, “Ain’t no god!” (See
the difference?)
But
us Heathens say, “We don’t know
enough not to know enough to know one way or the other. We are really in the dark on this one.” We
want to sleep in on Sunday mornings, listen to the birdies sing and would
really rather not be forced to shoot bullets at people for reasons we have no
strong issues with. Plus we want to be
able to wear Bowling shirts to work to show our faith; kind of like our Heathen
version of a Crucifix.
“I
see by the little Cross on that gold chain around your neck, that you are a Christian.”
“That’s
right. And I see by your Bowling shirt
here at work, that you are a Heathen.”
“Correct.”
Our
bumper stickers will be a strict adherence to the absence of bumper stickers on
our bumpers. None. Due to our unenlightened status, we take no sides because we … well, you know,
we don’t know.
Our
t-shirt logo will be a circle with a backwards slash across it. Nothing in the circle and the slash running
backwards, indicating “Null”. Which will
be our motto and mantra, “Null”. Or
drawn out as in non-committed meditation, ‘Nu-u-u-ll-ll-a-a-a-h”.
Our
t-shirt color will be beige. Or, may a
flat gray. No no wait! Our logo will be done in beige on a gray
t-shirt. With maybe a square around the
circle, because we can’t say we are necessarily committed to the circle.
http://dalepeterson.us
No comments:
Post a Comment